> Do you want to do trunking for extra bandwidth, for redundancy in case of > failure...what problem are you trying to solve?
Exactly... Both. Ok, so let's make this a little more complex. Here's how I envisioned this working. Subnet A 192.168.0.0/24 Subnet B 192.168.1.0/24 Subnet C 192.168.2.0/30 Subnet D 192.168.2.4/30 Router 1 fxp0 192.168.0.1/24 fxp1 192.168.2.1/30 fxp2 192.168.2.5/30 Router 2 fxp0 192.168.1.1/24 fxp1 192.168.2.2/30 fxp2 192.168.2.6/30 router1 route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.2 router1 route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.6 router2 route add 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.2.1 router2 route add 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.2.5 (may wrap) SubnetA---fxp0---router1----fxp1---- Subnet C ----fxp1----router2---fxp0---SubnetB SubnetA---fxp0---router1----fxp2---- Subnet D ----fxp2----router2---fxp0---SubnetB I intend to run Zebra and OSPF on routers 1 and 2. Subnets A and B are 100 Mbit/s networks. Subnets C and D are 10 Mbit/s networks, I would like to have a ~20 Mbit/s pipe when both lines are up, but if one fails, it dumbs down to ten. I am familiar with OSPF enough to (hopefully :) make it through the routing and failover, but I don't feel that Zebra will give me a 20 Mbit pipe. I am thinking about this in a routing frame of mind... Perhaps if there is a way to just "pair" up the adapters at the ethernet level it would be a simpler solution, but it would have to be able to fail over without blinking... I do not of such a capacity in FreeBSD, but if there is one, I would love to hear about it. Does this help to clarify the situation? Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"