Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 12:28:07PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:


I'm a bit confused, and it may just be a typo.

I recently updated a bunch of servers to patch the arp problem recently

Now, with the chaos in my life, plus getting physically ill during the last
few days, I've not been 100% sure I finished the upgrade on all these machines,
so I went around checking uname -a to make sure.

Every single machine I upgraded says 4.8-RELEASE-p5

Now, the security advisory claims the problem is fixed in 4.8-RELEASE-p10.

I know that I completely updated at least _some_ of these machines ;)

Anyway.  Is there a typo somewhere?  Or am I misunderstanding the

It depends on how you obtained the updated source code. If you used cvsup(1) to track the RELENG_4_8 branch, then you would have received inter-alia patches to sys/conf/ and other files that control what the system says it's version number is.

Well, I forgot to provide that information, but every one of these systems has been updated by cvsupping to RELENG_4_8, so I would have expected the version to update to p10.

Are other people who track RELENG_4_8 seeing this? Or is just me?

Bill Moran
Potential Technologies

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to