Thanks for your response. It may well be that I end up doing exactly that to fix this issue in the short term. But there are some internal resources that I don't want to have live IP's so I am trying for the workable NAT solution.
Regards, LukeK On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 07:20:15 -0500 "Minnesota Slinky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> granted us these pearls of wisdom: > Why bother doing nat? You *could* just setup a DHCP server on the > gateway for the remaining IP address and when the other 14 machines came > online, they could dynamically pull the IP addy. Just set some very > strict rules on the incoming packets to the rest of the internal > network. This is a similar thing to what I did when I had an 8-block > from Qwest a couple years ago. > > HTH > > Eric F Crist > AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc > (952) 403-9000 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Kearney > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:12 PM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: IPF and Routing > > > > Hello, > I have question regarding IPNat and routing. The situation is that I > need to setup a network where each machine gets a unique global IP > address from behind a firewall which performs NAT. I have 16 addresses > so my question is can I alias 14 addresses to the primary nic and then > config each private address to map directly to one global address or > have I missed something fundamental about this ? > > Any advice is appreciated. > > TIA LukeK > > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"