On Tuesday 07 October 2003 07:21 am, Luke Kearney wrote:
> Thanks for your response. It may well be that I end up doing exactly
> that to fix this issue in the short term. But there are some internal
> resources that I don't want to have live IP's so I am trying for the
> workable NAT solution.
>
> Regards,
>
> LukeK
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 07:20:15 -0500
>
> "Minnesota Slinky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> granted us these pearls of wisdom:
> > Why bother doing nat?  You *could* just setup a DHCP server on the
> > gateway for the remaining IP address and when the other 14 machines came
> > online, they could dynamically pull the IP addy.  Just set some very
> > strict rules on the incoming packets to the rest of the internal
> > network.  This is a similar thing to what I did when I had an 8-block
> > from Qwest a couple years ago.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Eric F Crist
> > AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc
> > (952) 403-9000

Do you mind if I ask you to elaborate on the configuration of your network and 
which services you don't want accessed?

-- 
Eric F Crist
AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc
(952) 403-9000

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature

Reply via email to