Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
> > What do you have HZ set to (see sysctl kern.clockrate)? I think I > > remember your original message showing you using pipes and queues > > and the HZ setting can affect those. Also see if your latency > > improves if you remove all pipe and queue rules (other ipfw rules > > are OK). > > > Here is the HZ setting: > > kern.clockrate: { hz = 100, tick = 10000, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 } > > I'm not sure how to remove the pipe since I don't think the pipe > works until the queue is defined. When I removed the queues that > are configured for the pipe, the latency is back to normal though. Like I said, remove both pipes and queues to test. However, pipes _can_ be used without queues, but that is irrelevant here. Try setting HZ to 1000 in your kernel config, recompile, reboot, and test again. You should see something between a slight improvement to a ten-fold improvement. Already tried that and it did improve things a little. I tried setting the HZ to 1000 and it didn't make much of a difference. Is there a larger number that actually works well? Thanks, John --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"