----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:02:53 -0400
To: Paul Seniura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I *really* need help PLEASE - buildworld failing on mkdep libstdc++can't
find unwind.h but it *is* there
> Paul Seniura wrote:
> > [Some of the maillists including -current@ are
> > down at the moment. I hope someone on this
> > list can help in meantime, please?]
> I can confirm that your email is making it to the list, anyway...
No one is getting -current@ since 'midnight' today (whatever timezone the mailserver
uses ;) which is where I originally posted this same msg. About half the lists are
down including CTM-via-email (FTP is current & okay there). Simon Nielson from -www@
says the postmaster has been notified. -questions@ is working, fornunately.
> > I've posted several msgs over the past two weeks
> > stumbling on buildworld when using lang/gcc33.
> ...and I remember seeing these messages go by, too. :-)
I'd seen another user ask about using the gcc ports, so I thought I'd take a plunge
and report back.
> Trying to build -CURRENT with a compiler from a port rather than with the
> default compiler is a wizard-mode operation (unfortuantely). I suspect that
> you would have better luck tracking RELENG_5_2 or RELENG_4.
I think I mentioned some time back that the port net/tn3270 I'm suppose to be working
on needs to track 5-Current because it relies on copying the /src/contrib/telnet tree.
And mentioned I'm trying to beat the deprecated functions, too, by making sure we can
use the next planned release gcc3.3.4, even. Well, we cannot use 'em as I've said,
just too many things need work.
> If you want to experiment with a gcc from ports, try rebuilding a specific
> application and benchmarking that before trying to do so with the entire
> world. If you wanted to perform a broader test, consider recompiling KDE and X11.
Yeah, I know. But 'til someone finds time to help, I can't do it alone, _way_ too
> [ ... ]
> > PLEASE Help - I do not want to blow everything away
> > and start completely over, as Da Bosses are looking
> > rather stern that this project is taking way too long.
> It is not clear to me what problem you are trying to solve by the activities
> you are pursuing: perhaps you ought to install 5.2.1 or 4.9 from a .iso image
> and get on with other tasks, and revisit the issue of recompiling world later?
Nutshell: I've gone back to using the system gcc. Now we're not able compile
libstdc++ and other related pieces; the headers _are_ there as mentioned in the
earlier msg. Just about every other thing under world _does_ compile & link properly
-- it is just the libstdc-type stuff. We should be running an installworld made from
April 8's bzip2all from current.freebsd.org, and fresh srcs from the CTM deltas up to
this morning. I don't know what else to check on, I'm needing another pair of eyes.
-- thx, Paul Seniura.
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"