On Mon, 29 November, 2004 16:37, Bill Moran said: > "David Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There have been quite a lot of threads in the past month regarding >> the >> network performance of 5.3 being inferior to 4.10. >> >> You might also want to bear in mind that with the 5 series you have >> the benefit of OpenBSD's pf firewall. Although more information on >> 4.x >> and pf is available at the following link. >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2004-September/000300.html >> >> Personally, if it was me, I'd go with 5.x rather than 4.x, but if >> you >> are going to be pushing a lot of data then perhaps search the >> archives >> for the last month or two regarding network performance. > > I'm not sure if this is 100% correct anymore. I seem to remember that > the performance problems were in 5.3BETA and were fixed prior to the > release of 5.3-RELEASE. > > I'm willing to be corrected if I'm wrong, but I think research of > reliable sources would be smart.
This is quite interesting. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-November/064401.html And specifically. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-November/064427.html Cheers, David _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"