Garrett, good day. Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:42:27PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Xin LI <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there any counter reasoning about "having an interface marked as > > non-DHCP is not an error"? I'm still not convinced with the benefit > > of having it show an error message. > > +1. I consider this to be debug noise.
Well, what about the silent output from 'cc -o test test.c' when you have no file test.c or the compiler is absent? It is the same thing (as I see it) and in this case will you expect that the binary 'test' will be compiled and ready for use or not? I will, but this can be my personal delusion. -- Eygene Ryabinkin ,,,^..^,,, [ Life's unfair - but root password helps! | codelabs.ru ] [ 82FE 06BC D497 C0DE 49EC 4FF0 16AF 9EAE 8152 ECFB | freebsd.org ]
pgpY5ou9qVPY0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
