-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/18/11 12:45, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Xin, good day. > > Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:38:31PM -0800, Xin LI wrote: >> Is there any counter reasoning about "having an interface marked >> as non-DHCP is not an error"? I'm still not convinced with the >> benefit of having it show an error message. > > Well, when I invoke 'service dhclient start em0' and em0 isn't > DHCP-enabled, I want to see some diagnostics on why I was not able > to get DHCP on that interface. Return code isn't that visible (I > can, of course, always run it as 'service dhclient start em0 || > echo failed'), but I am not up to typing more than needed and I > should see the real reason for absence of DHCP-assigned address in > that case, be it the non-DHCP-enabled interface or some other > problem.
Thinking again I believe that your approach is more sensible. Thanks! Cheers, - -- Xin LI <[email protected]> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOxsmkAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBRIYH/3dvKGznpmDbwPlNO0b4qs4w +Nd4eCKXY0SzHIvZqxm0c9HHE8wvMaZnQFqYb7rOYdlIYHosJfvhiTbIV1kr9YAJ FWmx93bCmzxf1HD3mVuOOCRzOoFEVcJPCstigh9Bp8Jj0EFPu6krbagrVCkY80Jo ZvRJoSEDmqKB8fve23RSpKVDrA5LlQ0Y98AC91yPKpVt/FdHsdWD7/+kKCF2G+uP OBPi8iCdHm4OALdX2YcHGQJFNZIixftEj74FHTHKDrlnBsiLb633U09kzprKMrqf 0iovaPf5OfX/smk8rLx0MrsFBDwSUwIhsaBsJJZr4vCtVDn4j0h0MZjtESZxO74= =BENK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
