On 12/11/2017 16:29, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
Matthew Finkel <[email protected]> wrote:
Why doesn't everyone have that option? Why is broadcasting a users information
across the internet forced upon them? Shouldn't they have a choice?
They do! HTTPS already exists!
This thread is about removing HTTP and forcing HTTPS - "Why should
HTTPS be forced upon them? Shouldn't they have a choice?"
:-)
| 21:16 (4) "/tmp" root@lapcat# svn export
https://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/usr.bin/fortune
| A fortune
| A fortune/datfiles
|
| [ ... ]
|
| A fortune/tools/Troff.sed
| Exported revision 326782.
Voila! A https delivery of "fortune" ! (Confirmed via tcpdump not to be
using fallback HTTP)
cheers!
Yuri,
I prefer HTTPS over HTTP as well, but wouldn't switching over to git and
using signed commits be even more secure than using HTTPS?
Yonas
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
