On 03/29/2010 12:11, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:43:08AM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote: >> From another thread I saw, it sounds like arc_max isn't really >> a "Hard Limit" but rather some kind of high water mark. If that's >> the case then I wonder if this might make more sense.... > > It became a hard limit in a semi-recent commit somewhere. I've lost > count of the modifications at this point. So, the perl script would > have to read __FreeBSD_version in /usr/include/osreldate.h and adjust > its output accordingly. >
Update: The current version in head r52 has these modifications now. As a side note while doing the the original modification I noticed some strange values (negative) and decided to just branch what I already had in head to stable/7 and continue with the modifications in head. arc_summary.pl has not been updated in the downloads section until I investigate more what happened with those negative values and why. I will probably be adding some more (2) lines to the ARC Size Breakdown area that compares its current usage to the the target_size so a comparison can be done side-by-side of the difference to current size and what it would look like at the target_size. Regards, -- jhell _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
