On 9/17/2010 2:14 AM, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
You either not understanding that this situation is about entire project (not
ISDN, but policy)
I think at this point that you've made your concerns clear. What you
don't seem to be understanding is:
1) The policy is, and always has been, those who are interested in
keeping code alive work on it.
2) No one was interested (by the definition above) in keeping the ISDN
code alive.
Now you have raised a valid point on how we can do the "volunteers
needed" notifications better in the future, and I think that those will
be taken to heart, and acted on the next time we face this situation.
hth,
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
