In the last episode (Feb 04), Damien Fleuriot said: > I have a firewall with 2x Intel pro dual port cards. > > On Intel A , port 1 goes to switch 1, port 2 goes to switch 2 > On Intel B , port 1 goes to switch 1, port 2 goes to switch 2 > > I have created the following 2 lagg devices using LACP: > > lagg0 = A1 + B1 > lagg1 = A2 + B2 > > This works fine. > > Now, what I had in mind was creating a lagg2 device using lagg0 and > lagg1 with failover. > > That would provide redundancy in case of a switch failure. > > ifconfig won't let me though: > > # ifconfig lagg2 laggproto failover laggport lagg0 laggport lagg1 > ifconfig: SIOCSLAGGPORT: Invalid argument > > I suppose it's not possible to aggregate lagg interfaces ?
Apparently not: http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/net/if_lagg.c#L516 It looks like there is preliminary code under #ifdef LAGG_PORT_STACKING, but it claims to be untested. -- Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
