On 20 April 2011 21:02, Ian Smith <smi...@nimnet.asn.au> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Ian Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > > > On 11.4.2011 6:08, Ian Smith wrote: > [..] > > > > Are those kern.cp_times values as they came, or did you remove > trailing > > > > zeroes? Reason I ask is that on my Thinkpad T23, single-core 1133/733 > > > > MHz, sysctl kern.cp_time shows the usual 5 values, but kern.cp_times > has > > > > the same 5 values for cpu0, but then 5 zeroes for each of cpu1 through > > > > cpu31, on 8.2-PRE about early January. I need to update the script to > > > > remove surplus data for non-existing cpus, but wonder if the extra > data > > > > also appeared on your 12 core box? > > > > > > I haven't removed anything, it's a pure copy&paste. > > > > Thanks. I'll check the single-cpu case again after updating to 8.2-R > > Ok, still a problem on at least my i386 single core Thinkpad T23 at > 8.2-R, since 8.0 I think, certainly evident in a sysctl -a at 8.1-R > > FreeBSD t23.smithi.id.au 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #1: Thu Apr 14 > 21:45:47 EST 2011 r...@t23.smithi.id.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > Verbose dmesg: http://smithi.id.au/t23_dmesg_boot-v.8.2-R.txt > sysctl -a: http://smithi.id.au/t23_sysctl-a_8.2-R.txt > > kern.ccpu: 0 > <cpu count="1" mask="0x1">0</cpu> > kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 > kern.smp.topology: 0 > kern.smp.cpus: 1 > kern.smp.disabled: 0 > kern.smp.active: 0 > kern.smp.maxcpus: 32 > kern.smp.maxid: 31 <<<<<<< > hw.ncpu: 1 > > kern.cp_times: 38548 1 120437 195677 9660939 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_clock.c: > return SYSCTL_OUT(req, 0, sizeof(long) * CPUSTATES * (mp_maxid + 1)); > > Consumers of kern.cp_times like powerd, top, dtrace? and others have to > loop over 32 cpus, all but one non-existent, and there seem to be many > places in the kernel doing eg: for (cpu = 0; cpu <= mp_maxid; cpu++) { > and while CPU_FOREACH / CPU_ABSENT will skip over them, seems wasteful > at best on machines least likely to have cycles to spare. > > eg: powerd parses kern.cp_times to count cpus, wasting cycles adding > up the 31 'empty' cpus. I haven't explored other userland consumers. > > Clearly kern.smp.maxid (ie mp_maxid) should be 0, not 31. On i386, > non-APIC i386 at least, mp_maxid is not set to (mp_ncpus - 1) as on some > other archs .. after having being initialised to (MAXCPU - 1) in > /sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c it's never updated for non-smp machines. > > I haven't chased all of these rabbits down all of their holes by any > means, but it seems that making /sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c do what it > says it's gonna do ('with an id of 0') should help. Paste, tabs lost: > > int > cpu_mp_probe(void) > { > /* > * Always record BSP in CPU map so that the mbuf init code works > * correctly. > */ > all_cpus = 1; > if (mp_ncpus == 0) { > /* > * No CPUs were found, so this must be a UP system. Setup > * the variables to represent a system with a single CPU > * with an id of 0. > */ > mp_ncpus = 1; > + mp_maxid = 0; > return (0); > } > > /* At least one CPU was found. */ > if (mp_ncpus == 1) { > /* > * One CPU was found, so this must be a UP system with > * an I/O APIC. > */ > + mp_maxid = 0; > return (0); > } > > /* At least two CPUs were found. */ > return (1); > } > > Note that the second added line above already exists in > /sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c, maybe to fix a similar problem, though > that should only apply to 'a UP system with an I/O APIC'. Maybe better > could be to fix this in cpu_mp_probe's caller, /sys/kern/subr_smp.c: > > static void > mp_start(void *dummy) > { > mtx_init(&smp_ipi_mtx, "smp rendezvous", NULL, MTX_SPIN); > > /* Probe for MP hardware. */ > if (smp_disabled != 0 || cpu_mp_probe() == 0) { > mp_ncpus = 1; > + mp_maxid = 0; > all_cpus = PCPU_GET(cpumask); > return; > } > > cpu_mp_start(); > printf("FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: %d CPUs\n", > mp_ncpus); > cpu_mp_announce(); > } > > I'm probably a long way off base for a solution, but think I've located > the problem. Thoughts? Is this a known issue? Might any developers > actually still have a single-cpu i386 system to check this on? :) > > Very happy to test any patches etc. >
Ouch. Looks like that affects a system with 2 cores as well. Intel Core2 E7200, 8.2-R i386 SMP: kern.smp.forward_signal_enabled: 1 kern.smp.topology: 0 kern.smp.cpus: 2 kern.smp.disabled: 0 kern.smp.active: 1 kern.smp.maxcpus: 32 kern.smp.maxid: 31 kern.cp_times: 867360 171 429180 70114 170549535 1385294 306 176659 82618 170270900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Your analysis looks promising. -- wbr, pluknet _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
