On Jun 2, 2012, at 00:51, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > On 02.06.2012, at 07:19, Freddie Cash <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between systems. >> So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre. >> > > How is this different than ZFS using remote zvols via iSCSI? Can it tolerate > down nodes better than ZFS?
Gluster ~ NFS++. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
