On 02.06.12 09:23, David Magda wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012, at 00:51, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 02.06.2012, at 07:19, Freddie Cash<[email protected]> wrote:
Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between systems.
So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre.
How is this different than ZFS using remote zvols via iSCSI? Can it tolerate
down nodes better than ZFS?
Gluster ~ NFS++.
So Gluster is basically ZFS with NFS frontend? Something readily
available in FreeBSD. The clients don't even have to learn new file
sharing protocol.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
