On 2 January 2013 16:05, Derek Kulinski <[email protected]> wrote: > Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote: >>> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was >>to >>> move it out of the base system. >> >>As the developer responsible for this: >> >>CVS will be removed from base. It already exists as a port in >>devel/cvs > > Will svn be added to the base? Not long ago I run into an issue when trying > to downgrade my system to 9.0. > > After I noticed how majority of ports were broken due to changes in the libc > I decided to back out by fetching 9.1 release just to learn that svn does not > work as well. There were a lot of dependencies I decided to use portupgrade > which required me to recompile ruby. After that it was a lot of compiling > (for example Apache because apr was broken). Having svn in the base would > save tons of time in my situation.
It certainly wouldn't, it would mean that instead of only building when you installed the port, it would build with every buildworld :) http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/base/user/des/svnsup/ needs fixing if you're feeling brave. It won't be easy, however. Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
