On 1/2/13 8:05 AM, Derek Kulinski wrote:
Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote:
To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was
to
move it out of the base system.
As the developer responsible for this:
CVS will be removed from base. It already exists as a port in
devel/cvs
Will svn be added to the base? Not long ago I run into an issue when trying to
downgrade my system to 9.0.
After I noticed how majority of ports were broken due to changes in the libc I
decided to back out by fetching 9.1 release just to learn that svn does not
work as well. There were a lot of dependencies I decided to use portupgrade
which required me to recompile ruby. After that it was a lot of compiling (for
example Apache because apr was broken). Having svn in the base would save tons
of time in my situation.
Sorry, you needed to fetch 9.0 packages then*. Putting all of that in
base is not likely to happen.
* I wish doing this was somewhat more intuitive/easy
-Alfred
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
