Hi,
>>>>> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 07:33:54 +0900 (JST)
>>>>> Hiroki Sato <h...@freebsd.org> said:
hrs> I think this just hides the problem. If gshapiro@'s explanation is
hrs> correct, no ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 address should be returned if the name
hrs> resolution works fine...
I changed getipnodebyname to obey ip6addrctl in years past. I read
RFC 2553 again, and realize that it mentions IPv6 addresses are
returned 1st. So, my past change might be bad thing. X-(
However, I'm still curious about use of AI_ALL in sendmail. As far as
I read the source of sendmail briefly, it seems the usage doesn't
depend on AI_ALL.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO
u...@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.mahoroba.org/~ume/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
