On 2013-02-14, at 08:41 , Rick Macklem <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Btw Marc, if you just want this problem to go away, I suspect getting rid
> of the "intr" mount option would do that.

Am more interested in fixing the problem (if possible) then just masking it, 
but ...

Based on the man page for mount_nfs, wouldn't that have the opposite effect:

             intr    Make the mount interruptible, which implies that file
                     system calls that are delayed due to an unresponsive
                     server will fail with EINTR when a termination signal is
                     posted for the process.

I may be mis-reading, but from the above it sounds like a -9 *should* terminate 
the process if intr is enabled, while with it disabled, it would ignore it … ?


_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to