Marc Fournier wrote: > On 2013-02-15, at 7:21 AM, Rick Macklem <rmack...@uoguelph.ca> wrote: > > >> > > Righto. Thanks jhb and kib for looking at this. > > > > Btw John, PBDRY still gets set for sleeps in the sys/rpc code. > > However, > > as far as I can tell, it just sets TDF_SBDRY when it is already set > > and seems harmless. (Since this code is supposed to be generic and > > not > > specific to NFS, maybe it should stay that way?) > > > > Also, since PBDRY on the sleeps sets TDF_SBDRY, I think the above > > patch > > is ok for stable/9 without your recent head patch. > > > > Maybe Marc can test the above patch? > > 'k, not sure what you want me to 'test', but so far, patch has been > applied / live for ~21hrs, and no processes in state T … > Yes, I meant run it like you normally do and see if the hang occurs with the patch (or other problems crop up). I suspect you have some idea of how long it needs to run without a hang before you are convinced the problem is fixed.
I can't do commits until April, so there is no rush from my point of view. (I suspect jhb@ will commit it at some point, if/when it appears to fix the problem and seems correct.) Thanks for testing it, rick > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
