On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 02:03:50PM -0400, J David wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Konstantin Belousov > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the easiest route is to a partial merge of the r253927 from HEAD. > > Is it helpful if we restart testing releng/9.2 using your suggested > fix? And if so, the IGN_SBUSY patch you posted earlier be applied as > well or no? No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch is not critical there.
> > If it ran successfully on a bunch of machines for next few days, maybe > that would still be in time to be useful feedback for 9.2. > > Thanks!
pgp3JVF_QAbg0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
