On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:11:09PM -0400, J David wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch >> > is not critical there. >> >> There is lots of other stuff in r250907 / reverted by r254754. Some >> of it looks important for sendfile() performance. If testing this >> extensively in the next few days could help get that work back into >> 9.2 we are happy to do it, but if it's too late then we can leave it >> for those on stable/9. > > The revert in the r254754 is only a workaround for your workload, it does > not fix the real issue, which can be reproduced by other means. > > I am not sure would re allow to merge the proper fix, since we are already > somewhere in RC3.
Well, let's ask them. :) Thanks! _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
