Kostik wrote: [stuff snipped] >insmnque() performs the cleanup on its own, and that default cleanup isnot >suitable >for the situation. I think that insmntque1() would betterfit your >requirements, your >need to move the common code into a helper.It seems that >>unionfs_ins_cached_vnode() cleanup could reuse it. <https://lists.freebsd.org> I've attached an updated patch (untested like the last one). This one creates a custom version insmntque_stddtr() that first calls unionfs_noderem() and then does the same stuff as insmntque_stddtr(). This looks like it does the required stuff (unionfs_noderem() is what the unionfs VOP_RECLAIM() does). It switches the node back to using its own v_vnlock that is exclusively locked, among other things.
rick
unionfs-newvnode.patch
Description: unionfs-newvnode.patch
_______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
