On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Zero Sum wrote:

> I know it is a bit off topic and if it has been discussed to death befire, 
> I apologise.  But for the lfe of me I can't see why anyone would use RAID 5 
> as other than an acadaemic exercise. 
> 
> If this seems like a troll, I'm sorry, but I have had this argument so many 
> time in RL.  In the past I have always managed to get better performance by 
> throwing RAID 5 out.

  But you don't use RAID 5 for performance.  RAID is about reliablity.  If
you want reliability and performance, RAID10 wins.  If you are operating
on a budget use RAID5, or if you are putting toghether a lot of storage, 
RAID50.


Tom
Uniserve



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Reply via email to