On Wednesday, 3 January 2001 at 10:29:44 +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Thomas Seck wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> sorry if this is OT for -stable, but I followed the discussion about
>> vinum in here and got a bit worried.
>>
>> I am currently deploying a proxy server for our company. It shall use
>> squid on 4.2-STABLE. I would like to put the cache data on a vinum RAID
>> 0, made of three U160 disks. As I understood the discussion so far,
>> there are some unresolved problems with the raid 5 code. Could someone
>> tell me whether I can safely use vinum for building a raid 0 system
>> (despite the fact that the HW may be a point of failure of course)?
>
> As far as I'm aware there are no problems using vinum for raid 0.
>
> As far as I understand from Greg he's not aware of many people who
> are having problems with raid 5.
Probably. If you know of somebody I don't know of, please let me
know.
> As one of the small minority who was having problems I'd advice you
> to soaktest any vinum raid 5 installation before committing
> important data to it.
That's what vinum(4) says.
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
