On Monday 24 November 2003 17:07, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 10:59 AM 24/11/2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >On Monday 24 November 2003 16:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > Are you sure you actually connect to an ERX on the other end, and its > > > actually negotiating LQR ? e.g. if you add LQM to the logging section, > > > do you see > > > tun0: LQM: deflink: Will send LQR every 10.00 secs > > > or do you see > > > tun0: LQM: deflink: LQR/ECHO LQR not negotiated > > > >Yes. > > > >LQM: deflink: Will send LQR every 30.00 secs > > > >I even found this way back in my ppp.log: > >Phase: deflink: ** Too many LQR packets lost ** > > > >So it's actually doing what it should. :) > > But is it doing that because its never hearing the LQR reply ?
Yes. ppp nicely detects when they're up and fuzzing with the AC again. > And for > sure its an ERX on the other end ? Actually it's an NRP - it seems Cisco does a better job with their PPPoE implementation. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
