On Monday 24 November 2003 17:35, Mike Tancsa wrote: > given that VJ Header compression also does not play well with FreeBSD's > I am leaning to the ERX.
Right, vjcomp, I don't need to disable that here as well... > Back to the original question of how best to work around this. I will be > deploying close to 100 boxes, most of which will talk to an ERX. It would > be nice if I could avoid having to manually patch the boxes each time I do > an update. If I work with my programmers here to come up with a patch, is > there even a chance that someone would commit it to HEAD and then MFC it > back to RELENG_4? Who is looking after PPP these days anyways ? I guess there is a definite chance, it's not like ppp's pppoe functionality is some rarely-used feature... I myself am only a lowly ports-committer, but if you submit a PR and send me a note, I'll make sure it gets assigned to brian (or maybe there are already PRs pending?). -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
