Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> For what I have seen everybody uses snd_emu10k1. Since I use my onboard
> soundcard (snd_ess* (not MPSAFE)) I have less problems with my sound under
> disk load.
> [...]
No, I don't. I use and_emu10kx, which behaves far better under high load
than the standard snd_emu10k1.
> Oh, I saw a post a while ago on stable@ or on current@ about a buffer in
> emu10k1. If it was increased it had less problems. [...]
Yes, I've read those mails, though it's not sound-under-load issue. Not
only and not mainly. It's more that the interactive work in X(org) under
the high i/o in certain cases (like the mentioned untaring) is getting
painful.
Regards,
--
There is no satisfaction in hanging a man who does not object to it.
-- G.B. Shaw
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
