On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:30:43AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote: > > > "Jos? M. Fandi?o" wrote: > > > > > > > > Chris wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Have tested on 3 boxes. > > > > > > > > yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't > > > > believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible. > > > > > > Finally, I found the culprit: > > > > > > CFLAGS="" \ 100% of the transmited traffic is received > > > COPTFLAGS="" / > > > > > > CFLAGS= -pipe \ 50% of the transmited traffic is received > > > COPTFLAGS= -pipe / > > > > That would be exceedingly strange, because the above two options are > > supposed to produce *no differences at all* with the code generation. > > > > I'd believe that -O and no -O could behave differently, although I > > don't know why you'd want to compile without -O.
Actually, the only way I can make sense of this is if CFLAGS="" uses the default CFLAGS, which is -O -pipe. Kris
pgpDmj6aR8qEu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
