On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:35:46PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > You are refusing personal email. This is a bit antisocial since it > > > leaves me no way to reply privately to your email. > > > > Hi Kris, > > Huh ? Some mistake. No intent to block, except the usual list of > > spam domains & phrases get filtered. Maybe something got wrongly > > listed there though. But I have had problems a while back, & been > > reconfiging lots of things, inc named etc last few days. Wasn't > > aware anyone inconvenienced, sorry if so. Please private mail max > > info on nature of the block you see & I'll try to solve it. I'll > > private mail you (don't want 'em in list archive :-) > > some addresses you can use to send the debug of the blockage you > > see & I'm unaware of. > > Cheers. > > That mail routed through mu.org which is listed as a spam domain here, > so my SMTP issued "Access denied http://berklix.com/~jhs/phone/"; > (To rescue the occasional non spammer that might inadvertently get caught). > > I dont keep records of each spam that causes each domain to be > added to the spam list. Looking at mu.org To see what it is: > http://www.mu.org/ features a female nude. Tableware, Hosting > for christians & hodge podge of strange domain names - I > wouldn't be suprised if spammers had lurked @ mu.org. Not > a tight unified ship. nslookup doesn't show an MX for > obsecurity.org @ mu.org, but mu.org was an uplink on Dyn-DNS > from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whois lists Paul Saab, not a name I know. > I don't use external RBL services, so don't know if public RBLs block mu.org > ?
lol, that's the stupidest thing I've heard all week. finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kris
pgp8WBahB5z5c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
