> > If you want to avoid the long fsck-times your remaining options are a > > journaling filesystem or zfs, either requires an upgrade from freebsd > > 6.2. I have used zfs and had a serverstop due to powerutage in out > > area. Our zfs-samba-server came up fine with no data corruption. So I > > will suggest freebsd 7.0 with zfs. > > But, if I don't go with zfs, which would be a better way to slice the > space up: RAID volumes exported as individual disks to freebsd, or > one RAID volume divided into multiple logical partitions with disklabel?
If you want to place data and the transaction-log on different partitions you want to be shure they reside on different physical disks so you probably want option 1. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
