El día Friday, November 19, 2010 a las 12:39:13PM -0700, Warren Block escribió:
> > Just an idea: The USB key in question was new and I only created the
> > file system on it the usual way (fdisk, bsdlabel, newfs). Then I
> > restored the dump on it (which took 26 hours for 3.1 GByte dump file).
> > The USB key boots fine, btw.
> 26 *hours*? USB 1.1?
I don't think so. It is the Acer One D250 netbook.
> Well, they could be anything. But the original filesystem has
> formerly-used blocks with old data from deleted files. dump doesn't
> copy those, but dd does.
> > Should I overwrite the full USB key from /dev/zero?
> Possibly there would still be differences. Filesystem metadata like
> date last mounted, for example. If you want a block-by-block duplicate,
> the brute-force method is to just dd the whole drive. Use bs=64k or
> bs=1m to help reduce overhead.
Warren, perhaps you missed my point. I have a prepared boot-able key and
I want to give away a copy of it as a file on DVD. So I dd(1)'ed the key
to disk and did this twice to ensure that the copy was fine, but the two
files differ. How can I make sure that the file on disk (or DVD) is a
exact copy of the key?
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e <g...@unixarea.de> - w http://www.unixarea.de/
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"