On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:11:08PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On 05/02/2011, at 16:01, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> On 07/01/2010, at 14:54, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >>> One problem is that ports don't know which version to use, it would be 
> >>> nice 
> >>> if they could just depend on devel/libusb and Magic Happened (tm) to pick
> >>> the correct thing.
> > 
> > The correct solution is 'USE_LIBUSB=yes' with relevant magic in bsd.port.mk
> > Unfortunately this is unlikely to occur because it's only needed for 7.x
> > which will be dying within the next few years.
> USE_LIBUSB= would be nice, I will see if I can author such a thing..
> That said it is still desirable to have .pc files for libusb as I believe 
> that is the canonical way to determine how to compile & link against it.
> If that is by making USE_LIBUSB adds a dep to a pseudo port which installs 
> the .pc files, or adds no dep because the .pc files are in base are pretty 
> much equivalent IMO.
> >> What about if devel/pkgconfig is modified to search in 
> >> /usr/libdata/pkgconfig and systems with native libusb have entries in 
> >> there?
> > 
> > Apart from libusb, are there any other apps in the base system that
> > could reasonably install .pc files?
> None come to mind..

Actually, at least OpenSSL comes to mind, although it currently doesn't.


Peter Pentchev  r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org pe...@packetscale.com
PGP key:        http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
because I didn't think of a good beginning of it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to