On Saturday 22 December 2012 11:17:15 Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net> 
wrote:
> > If you look in the old libusb-0.1 code you'll see something different I
> > think. Could you check that?
> 
> Not much differences in reality. I believe it is a document bug for the
> libusb-0.1.
> 
> Both old libusb-0.1 code and libusb-1.0 use the same IOCTL under Linux
> and the behavior should be similar.
> 
> Please refer to the following code listing and take note even though
> the name of the IOCTL is different but they are the same if you
> look at the defines.

Can you create a thread for this at the libusb lists?

--HPS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to