On Saturday 22 December 2012 11:17:15 Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net> wrote: > > If you look in the old libusb-0.1 code you'll see something different I > > think. Could you check that? > > Not much differences in reality. I believe it is a document bug for the > libusb-0.1. > > Both old libusb-0.1 code and libusb-1.0 use the same IOCTL under Linux > and the behavior should be similar. > > Please refer to the following code listing and take note even though > the name of the IOCTL is different but they are the same if you > look at the defines.
Can you create a thread for this at the libusb lists? --HPS _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"