On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net> wrote: > On Saturday 22 December 2012 11:17:15 Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net> > wrote: >> > If you look in the old libusb-0.1 code you'll see something different I >> > think. Could you check that? >> >> Not much differences in reality. I believe it is a document bug for the >> libusb-0.1. >> >> Both old libusb-0.1 code and libusb-1.0 use the same IOCTL under Linux >> and the behavior should be similar. >> >> Please refer to the following code listing and take note even though >> the name of the IOCTL is different but they are the same if you >> look at the defines. > > Can you create a thread for this at the libusb lists?
Okay. -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"