On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net> wrote:
> On Saturday 22 December 2012 11:17:15 Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net>
> wrote:
>> > If you look in the old libusb-0.1 code you'll see something different I
>> > think. Could you check that?
>> Not much differences in reality. I believe it is a document bug for the
>> libusb-0.1.
>> Both old libusb-0.1 code and libusb-1.0 use the same IOCTL under Linux
>> and the behavior should be similar.
>> Please refer to the following code listing and take note even though
>> the name of the IOCTL is different but they are the same if you
>> look at the defines.
> Can you create a thread for this at the libusb lists?


freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to