On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Lauzé <brunola...@msn.com> wrote: > > > > Using jails, customers are uncomfortable with the fact documents can be > accessed from the host with root access.Project VPS seems to isolate more > the guest from the host but not as well as an hypervisor like bhyve. With > an hypervisor what the client have is private, as long as the host can > manage the disk, delete it, but the information is kept private from the > host. > > Any suggestions how to offer jail, vps, or anything containers > techniques with total file system isolation from the host, or the only way > is to go hypervisor, with the performance and instances count penalty that > goes with it? > > Untrusted hypervisors is an active area of academic research. > However, any such scheme requires additional hardware support. > > If you are interested I can give you some papers to look at. I'm interested, can you provide the links of the papers ? _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"