On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Gyrd Thane Lange <[email protected]>wrote:
> Den 27. nov. 2013 21:50, skrev Michael Dexter: > > On 11/27/13 6:12 AM, Gyrd Thane Lange wrote: >> >>> I appears the AMD patches for the vmm module have not made it to CURRENT >>> yet. Would it be easy to prepare a patch-set? Or give me some hints on >>> how to do it myself? >>> >> >> Correct. Did you try one of the SVM snapshots linked at bhyve.org or >> build a bhyve-svm project branch yourself? >> > > This is my main machine at home that is in continual use for everything, > so I'm hoping to avoid changing to a different branch. But I can briefly > try dual booting with a spare disk containing the project branch to find > out if my machine supports bhyve at all. > > To clarify: I'm already aware of the bhyve-svm project branch, but rather > than run the full branch I'm hoping for some insight into which commits (in > the branch) are essential in running bhyve on AMD. > > Gyrd ^_^ > > For what it is worth, I have many AMD cpu's and I am waiting to do more testing when amd-svm hits the HEAD branch... I test so many patches, that running a separate project branch is complex. are we close to merging svm to HEAD? -- Sam Fourman Jr. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
