On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:11, Giovanni Mattera <giovanni.matt...@cost.it> wrote:
> Yes i test it but not work > The CARP protocolol remain in state INIT. > That's unfortunate. If you do a packet dump do you even see the other node's advertisements? CARP is really at the mercy of these half-baked virtual switches; if they refuse to pass the traffic there's not much that can be done from the virtualized guest's perspective. I don't know the procedure for opening a support case with Microsoft but if that's an option it would be nice to know what their response is. I did run into this a while back on XenServer and wondered if it would be possible to work around it by doing a GRE tunnel between the two nodes and doing CARP over that, tying it all in with scripts that are called by devd events. I have not had time to experiment and see if you can do multicast over GRE tunnels though and it's probably a very bad idea. _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"