> Hi Rod,
> Can you share a command line for that?
Its not just a single command, but you want these in /etc/rc.conf of the GUEST:
network_interfaces="lo0"
cloned_interfaces="vlan48"
ifconfig_lo0=" inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000"
ifconfig_vtnet0=" up"
ifconfig_vlan48=" inet 192.168.48.38 netmask 0xffffff00 vlan 48
vlandev vtnet0"
That may be your issue... is your vtnet0 "up" in the guest.
It would help a whole lot to share more of the info about
your system, from commands, not from "vm-bhyve" settings.
Like
ifconfig -a
on the host and the guest would be a starting point.
> I also tried presenting an access port from my switch on a specific VLAN -
> not trimmed.
Trimmed? You mean you set the switch port to untagged mode,
and had the switch tag/untag the packets to a specific vlan.
Be sure you also set the default incoming tag at the switch if you did this,
some switches do not follow the vlan setting.
> Would I still have to tag the interface on the guest in that scenario?
No. If I understand what I think you meant by trimmed.
> Regards,
>
>
> Paul Esson | Redstor Limited
> t +44 (0)118 951 5235
> m +44 (0)776 690 6514
> e [email protected]
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rodney W. Grimes <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 9:33:57 PM
> To: Paul Esson
> Cc: Harry Schmalzbauer; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: bhyve networking
>
> [ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ]
> > Hi Harry,
> > I?m simply using the ?vm? utility as in
> >
> > vm switch create public
> > vm switch add public igb1
> >
> > That must make underlying calls to if config or equivalent as the bridge
> > and tap interfaces are created automatically.
> >
> > The vm template file has these relevant parameters
> >
> > network0_type=?virtio-net?
> > network0_switch=?public?
> >
> > I?ve done nothing to the igb1 interface other than connect it to a physical
> > switch on the appropriate VLAN.
>
> How have you configured your vtnet devices inside the guest? If your pass a
> "trunked" ethernet device
> to a guest the guest is going to need to run vlan decapuslation. I do this
> here, and it works fine.
>
> vtnet0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0
> mtu 1500
> options=80028<VLAN_MTU,JUMBO_MTU,LINKSTATE>
> ether 58:9c:fc:0e:8b:ec
> nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T <full-duplex>
> status: active
> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
> options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
> nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
> groups: lo
> vlan48: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
> ether 58:9c:fc:0e:8b:ec
> inet 192.168.48.38 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.48.255
> nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T <full-duplex>
> status: active
> vlan: 48 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: vtnet0
> groups: vlan
>
> ...
> >
> > Bez?glich Paul Esson's Nachricht vom 25.04.2018 20:44 (localtime):
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > I'm struggling with networking when using vm-bhyve on FreeBSD
> > > 11.1-RELEASE. I have two NICs and have configured the first (igb0) on a
> > > management network and want to use the second (igb1) for VMs. However, I
> > > can't get any VM to communicate through the virtual switch if I have igb1
> > > added to it. If I take the NIC out of the switch and configure an ipv4
> > > address on it I can reach other hosts on the relevant subnet so I believe
> > > the poet set-up is valid. If I replace igb1 in the switch with igb0, I
> > > can then configure VMs on my management network and they have network
> > > connectivity. Can I only use
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > a example of the command you used was nice.
> > I guess you're using if_bridge(4) ? the example would clarify.
> > But there's ng_bridge(4) and vale(4) also, and others are using
> > OpenVSwitch...
> >
> > > an interface that has an IP address configured at the host level before
> > > adding it to the switch? I've used other
> >
> > No.
> > But the interface has to be in promisc mode. And some offloading
> > functions must be disabled, but in case of if_bridge(4), it's done
> > automagically (and reverted if you remove the interface again).
> >
> > Hth,
> >
> > -harry
> > _______________________________________________
> > [email protected] mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > "[email protected]"
> >
> >
>
> --
> Rod Grimes [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[email protected]"
>
--
Rod Grimes [email protected]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[email protected]"
