On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 February 2013 11:50, Monthadar Al Jaberi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Seems like the best architectural wise, first-in first out. I am just >> thinking of one can extend this too have like more than one queue, >> more like the QoS concept, and each packet have a time-stamp assigned >> to it.Would that help? > > Well, the queue thing is a bit orthogonal. Yes, we could run multiple > queues and multiple kernel threads. But what would multiple kernel > threads get us?
I was thinking one kernel thread. This thread have some headroom to take from the higher priority queue if the frame on the other queue is not old "enough". > > > > Adrian -- Monthadar Al Jaberi _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
