Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then merge in more stuff from you?
-adrian On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS <c...@cgross.info> wrote: > > De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_br...@yahoo.com] > > À : Cedric GROSS > > Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; firstname.lastname@example.org > > Objet : RE: [IWN] Review > > > > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now. > > > > > > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD. > > > Cedric > > > > Cedric: > Hi Sean, > > > > > Which branch should we be testing? > > > > As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an > split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC. > > Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC series. > Could be a good idea to test this version with à lot of NIC. > > > sean > > Thanks > Cedric > > _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"