Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then merge
in more stuff from you?


-adrian



On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS <c...@cgross.info> wrote:

> > De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_br...@yahoo.com]
> > À : Cedric GROSS
> > Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> > Objet : RE: [IWN] Review
> >
> > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now.
> > >
> > > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD.
> > > Cedric
> >
> > Cedric:
> Hi Sean,
>
> >
> > Which branch should we be testing?
> >
>
> As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an
> split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC.
>
> Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC series.
> Could be a good idea to test this version with à lot of NIC.
>
> > sean
>
> Thanks
> Cedric
>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to