Hello Adrian,
Its up to you. If you wish to continue commit small part review split_6, split_7 and split_8. Or directly test and commit split_8. >From split_8, its remaining Seans work : - Led management - Power supply management After that, freebsd repo will be at same level as my github repo. And may be will able to work on improving speed and add hostap mode. Cedric De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : mercredi 16 octobre 2013 06:56 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : Sean Bruno; [email protected] Objet : Re: [IWN] Review Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then merge in more stuff from you? -adrian On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS <[email protected]> wrote: > De : Sean Bruno [mailto:[email protected]] > À : Cedric GROSS > Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; [email protected] > Objet : RE: [IWN] Review > > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote: > > Hello, > > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now. > > > > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD. > > Cedric > > Cedric: Hi Sean, > > Which branch should we be testing? > As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC. Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC series. Could be a good idea to test this version with à lot of NIC. > sean Thanks Cedric _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
