On 01/04/12 11:55, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Colin Percival <cperc...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 01/03/12 09:40, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 09:07 -0800, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
>>>> Does someone running production workload with FreeBSD on EC2 ?
> I´d asked the wrong question... are the FreeBSD instances stable
> enough to run Network/FileSystem very intensive workload ?
The HVM instances are very stable.
>>>> I'm interested in running network (dns and http with accept filter)
>>>> and memory/buffer cache intensive applications on m1.small, m1.large
>>>> and m2.xlarge instances.
>>>> Any thoughts ?
>> You can't run FreeBSD on m1.small, but it works just fine on m1.large and
>> m2.xlarge as long as you don't mind paying the "Windows tax".
> By "paying the Windows tax" you mean that it run in HVM instead of PV Xen
> mode ?
Yes, the 64-bit instances (except cluster compute) are running HVM, which is
only available by having EC2 think that you're running Windows. So Amazon
bills you for the cost of a Windows instance, including license fee.
Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve
Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"