On Jun 19, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Jeroen van der Ham <jer...@dckd.nl> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 19 Jun 2013, at 18:15, Justin T. Gibbs <gi...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> I've never seen a kernel build take 2 hours, much less 2 hours *longer*. >> Are you talking about buildworld? It would be interesting to know your >> results building stable/9 sources in your 10 environment to see if this is >> just due to "build bloat" or a true performance regression. >> > > I copy/pasted the command from the wiki: > >> # make kernel-toolchain && make buildkernel KERNCONF=XENHVM && make >> installkernel KERNCONF=XENHVM > > On the stable/9 I only did > >> make buildkernel KERNCONF=XENHVM && make installkernel KERNCONF=XENHVM > > > I guess the kernel-toolchain takes a long time to build…and from what I can > see it does a clean before rebuilding also. > > I'm doing the kernel-toolchain step only now and will report how long it took. > > Jeroen. Oh. Without any parallelism (-j X), the build will take a really long time. Even with only one core, you'll get a large speedup by performing a parallel build since many steps of the build are I/O bound. -- Justin _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"