Acaba bu teste symfony nin etkisi var mı? Yani bildiğim kadarıyla symfony nin kendi cache mekanizması var?
Şurada da bir test var ; http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/23/php-accelerators-apc-vs-zend-vs-xcache-with-zend-framework/ 2008/6/24 Mesut GÜLNAZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Çok teşekkürler... > > > > From: Engin Dumlu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] hangi php cache uygulaması > > > > symfony framework üzerinde çalışan bir sistemde test yaptım, xcache bariz > fark atıyor, sonuçlar şöyle: > > ---------------------- eacc ----------------------------- > > srv1:/www/stage# ab -c 10 -t 6 http://localhost/ > This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> apache-2.0 > Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ > Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ > > Benchmarking localhost (be patient) > Finished 465 requests > > > Server Software: Apache/2.2.3 > Server Hostname: localhost > Server Port: 80 > > Document Path: / > Document Length: 5935 bytes > > Concurrency Level: 10 > Time taken for tests: 6.11133 seconds > Complete requests: 465 > Failed requests: 0 > Write errors: 0 > Total transferred: 2973672 bytes > HTML transferred: 2777580 bytes > Requests per second: 77.36 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 129.272 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 12.927 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) > Transfer rate: 482.94 [Kbytes/sec] received > > Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max > Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 > Processing: 43 126 83.1 107 880 > Waiting: 43 126 83.0 106 880 > Total: 43 126 83.1 107 880 > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 107 > 66% 129 > 75% 148 > 80% 158 > 90% 195 > 95% 271 > 98% 378 > 99% 543 > 100% 880 (longest request) > > > > > ------------------ xcache ----------------------- > > srv1:/www/stage# ab -c 10 -t 6 http://localhost/ > This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> apache-2.0 > Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ > Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ > > Benchmarking localhost (be patient) > Finished 624 requests > > > Server Software: Apache/2.2.3 > Server Hostname: localhost > Server Port: 80 > > Document Path: / > Document Length: 5935 bytes > > Concurrency Level: 10 > Time taken for tests: 6.1119 seconds > Complete requests: 624 > Failed requests: 0 > Write errors: 0 > Total transferred: 3971250 bytes > HTML transferred: 3709375 bytes > Requests per second: 103.98 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 96.172 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 9.617 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) > Transfer rate: 646.21 [Kbytes/sec] received > > Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max > Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 > Processing: 23 94 64.5 72 434 > Waiting: 0 93 64.4 71 434 > Total: 23 94 64.5 72 434 > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 72 > 66% 104 > 75% 125 > 80% 139 > 90% 183 > 95% 217 > 98% 277 > 99% 330 > 100% 434 (longest request) > > > 2008/6/24 OSMAN ORHAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Facebook un APC kullandığını biliyorum, ama facebook un bu konuda kötü > olduğunu da eklemek lazım(fakat bunu direk cache mekanizmasına > bağlamak doğru olmaz herhalde); > http://www.scribd.com/doc/88689/apcfacebook > > > > 2008/6/23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Selam; >> >> PHPAccelerator kullandim acikcasi cok verimli degildi. Su an XCache >> kullaniyorum gayet memnunum ince ayarlar yaparak cok iyi performanslar >> alabilirsiniz. >> >> Saygilar >> >>> opcode cache için 3 senedir eaccelerator kullanıyorum, ortalama rps 3-4 >>> kat >>> artıyor diyebilirim >>> >>> normalde 30 - 40 req/s iken eacc ile 80 - 90 req/s >>> >>> xcachede fena değil aslında, >>> >>> >>> http://xcache.lighttpd.net/wiki/Introduction#ButwhydoyouwriteXCacheafterthatWhynotcontributetoeaapc >>> >>> selamlar >>> >>> >>> 2008/6/22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>>> merhabalar, >>>> >>>> xcache, APC ya da eaccelerator. >>>> >>>> bu 3 uygulamayı da kurdum. çalıştırdım. denedim ama hangisini >>>> kullanacağıma >>>> karar veremedim. >>>> >>>> sizler hangisini tansiye edersiniz.? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Engin Dumlu >>> >> >> >> >> FreeBSD 6 kitabi: http://www.acikakademi.com/catalog/freebsd6 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Listeye soru sormadan once lutfen http://ipucu.enderunix.org sitesine >> bakiniz. >> >> Cikmak icin, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Liste arsivi: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.bsd.turkey >> >> >> > > > -- > Engin Dumlu
