<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40326 >
2008/6/26 Jason Dorje Short: > > Marko Lindqvist wrote: >> >> 2008/6/25 Jason Dorje Short: >>> Hm, shouldn't the generated files be put into the build dir? or does >>> generate_packets already do this? >> >> Yes, they should, but see #8164 for header problems that would cause. > > True! I remember that discussion. > > But skimming to the end it looks like the conclusion is the whole thing > could be done just fine, if only we were willing to use <> instead of "" > for our header includes? I think the final solution (so far) in that ticket; separate directory for generated headers, would be cleaner and more robust solution. I'll test that for S2_2 / trunk. Current ticket is about backporting S2_1 solution to S2_0. IMO if we start backporting fixes to this, S2_2 solution should be backported to both S2_1 and S2_0. Workdir for generate_packets.py execution is builddir, but it generates files to source tree. - ML _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
