Follow-up Comment #6, bug #15728 (project freeciv):
> Couple more cosmetic comments: there are remaining references to
> TM_WORST_TIME in the header comments for pf_danger_map_iterate()
> and pf_fuel_map_iterate() (point 4), and to "turn mode" in the
> header for pf_normal_map_adjust_cost().
Fixed now.
> Can we neglect occupychance? I don't think it matters for
> client-side goto, but does the AI ever rely on path-finding to
> determine where it ends up after an attack? I haven't tried to
> work this out.
This should be a separated bug. It is very easy to take in account
occupychance. I guess that for a human player, it should be taken in account
if occupychance=100 and for an ai player if occupychance>0.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?15728>
_______________________________________________
Message posté via/par Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
