Follow-up Comment #2, task #7246 (project freeciv):

I'm not currently for removing amplio from svn. It should be enough that it's
not part of distribution tarball.

I don't see it causing any trouble in svn.
I consider it as a test case for tileset handling, and it's much more
convenient to maintain along other tilesets in svn than otherwise in case
someone still wants to use it. So I'd say we keep it in svn until some tileset
format change or similar would create need for too-big-to-be-sensible
maintenance fix for it.


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Gna!

Freeciv-dev mailing list

Reply via email to