Update of bug #18513 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test => Fixed
Assigned to: None => cazfi
Open/Closed: Open => Closed
Follow-up Comment #7:
> Is this the way to go if different functionallity is needed in
> common code for server and client?
Libfreeciv (utility + common) should be as self-contained as possible, with
utility being self-contained even in relation to common, but when libfreeciv
user (executable) specific functionality is deemed necessary, this seems like
best way to do it.
Reply to this item at:
Message sent via/by Gna!
Freeciv-dev mailing list