Update of bug #18513 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Fixed Assigned to: None => cazfi Open/Closed: Open => Closed
_______________________________________________________ Follow-up Comment #7: > Is this the way to go if different functionallity is needed in > common code for server and client? Libfreeciv (utility + common) should be as self-contained as possible, with utility being self-contained even in relation to common, but when libfreeciv user (executable) specific functionality is deemed necessary, this seems like best way to do it. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/bugs/?18513> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev